Tag Archives: Writing

Pagan Culture Writing

Content and Control

I wrote this post earlier this summer, during the hottest days of the year. The tsunami had not yet finished with its unpredictable backlash, and a few unexpected events happened at the height of festival season. One of those included a local Pagan festival getting caught in a flash flood. No one was hurt, little was lost, and I think for the most part, people might have been a touch embarrassed for camping in a flood plane, but in the long run the group handled the emergency really well.

The real problem was not what happened. It was how people thought what happened looked.  People get strangely territorial and competitive over conflicting local events, forgetting that a)no one can possibly serve EVERYONE and b)time is the most finite of all resources.

They also get really nervous around journalists. Like politicians, those of us who work as reporters have done a lot to earn mistrust. Also like politicians, journalists are often projection boards for the fears of those who see them. Fear has a loud voice. It can keep a person from hearing, reading, seeing or even smelling what you really want to communicate.

Because of the weird squabbling produced by competition-induced (and denial about being competitive) amnesia, it took some work to get people to talk to me. In the process, I had to acknowledge the feelings of others about the press and how they wished we would operate. Those wishes often violate the principles of journalism as it used to be, and the PNC is in my opinion a Reconstructionist movement. We’re using digital tools, but we’re trying to rebuild journalism from the old days.

Thankfully, the people that went on record willingly heard me out on how I saw the story and why I wanted to report it as I did. What happened was not the result of stupidity and poor planning. In fact, it demonstrated good planning. Being honest and open got me the story, although I’m sure I have more work to do to build long-term trust.

This was written before I was able to persuade everyone that did to go on record. It is a rumination on the important of self-honesty and transparency, and why we need to stop protecting ourselves from embarrassment. Embarrassment is a reaction of the ego, only. The highest self does not get embarrassed. It simply observes and learns from the experience. read more »




Writing

Writing: what you imagine, versus what is

from Arts Renewal International

There’s “Ask” culture – the one where you make an effort to assume nothing, or you assume from the beginning you do not know/may not understand what you just heard or read.

Then there’s “Guess” culture- where you make an assumption and move forward on that premise. Writers spend a lot of time guessing. We guess what the editor wants. We guess what our audience will like. We even guess what we might get paid, if at all, for our contributions.

In the US, we’re transitioning from “Guess” to “Ask.”  While we do this, we have people littered throughout generations on one side or the other of this premise.

Pagans, if asked, would insist that they are “Ask” culture – it is, after all, viewed as the more considerate, inclusive, non-judgmental way. You make no assumptions about race, religious creed or sexual preference. You express your feelings authentically, saying “I feel,” or “I feel like” rather than resorting to physical outbursts or projective rants. You try to overcome the overculture most of us knew, the ones where our mothers and fathers never talked about their feelings and often praised avoiding even mentioning let alone acknowledging the ills in the family that were destroying it from within.1

Pagans are still human, and as much as we are naturally and actively different from those around us at times, we don’t like to admit that sometimes we make the same assumptions as everybody else.

We really, really do.

Especially when it comes to writing.

I’m not innocent here. I have delusions about writing, but I am trying to rid myself of them, rid myself of my childhood acculturation.

I was raised in a “Guess” household, and I subverted that by using it do what I wanted with my life instead of pursuing parental approval. My parents could say nothing without admitting they were being assholes, and I have pretended for years that I simply guessed wrong about what they wanted. The truth is, I believe they had no business “wanting” anything about my future, because my future and my life belongs to me, not them. They could never “guess” this about me; part of guess culture involves not concerning yourself with what the person “beneath” you thinks and believes.

I want the system to change, yet I use a loophole in the system to my own benefit. I will not like it when culture changes so much that that loophole disappears.

I have made many assumptions. I apologize when I realize what I’ve done, but sometimes, I’m just not paying attention.

So, somewhere between Guess and Ask, this is what I’m confronting in what people imagine about me as a writer: read more »

  1. Which is why more than 80% of American families are now classified as dysfunctional. Because they’re terrified to admit they’re screwed up, they’re even more screwed up. []
Travel

Paris! Are you jealous?

way less gross than carrying an actual wishbone - and more travel friendly

 This starts as a sermon and ends as a love letter.

On the ceiling: nervous, terrified, overwhelmed, paranoid, overjoyed, exuberant, ecstatic.

I’m going to Paris!

While I’m a little sad at the typical reaction, “Oooh, I’m jealous!” I do understand why. Paris is one of those things that shows up in movies, and is for the vast majority of people a vague fantasy. It belongs to the rich, to the people with relatives in France, to the just-out-of-school types with parents that can pay for them to backpack around Europe or go on one of those expensive “educational trips.”

To most of us, it’s just fiction.

While I know people that qualify as lower and lower middle class have traveled the world quite a bit, most have done it with significant financial boosts from family and friends. There is nothing wrong with this, although my US American soul is a bit ashamed that I’m making this trip through no accomplishment of my own.

I’m also a little sad about the jealousy stuff.

I’m hoping more people, over time, learn to set aside jealousy and simply celebrate the good things that happen to other people.

I am promising myself now that this is what I will do when someone achieves something I want for myself. As a professional writer, I get lots of opportunities to practice this. Every time another writer gets a book published, gets a great contract, gets some fantastic press recognition – I say “Congratulations!” I take a moment to put some emotional energy into it, to pay forward their good.  I have had some time to look over my life and all the petty jealousies that have littered it. I can honestly say that most of the time, the jealousy was not mine. When confronted with someone else’s towards me, I have always been bewildered by it.

It’s not like life has been easy for me. It’s not like any accomplishment was just handed to me – when I’ve made an achievement it’s been on my own power, and quite real.1

To my knowledge, no one has experienced life altering loss or suffering because of my own achievements. Yes, I could do the saintly immobilization thing, and carry on about how the plane hurts the environment, or how I’m touring the military industrial complex or contributing to injustices against traveling American citizens. Ah yes, I could be a saint – or I can act like I’m not a well-approved corpse. What value does going ON about how everything sucks actually have, especially since “everything sucks” is the biggest and most frequent lie ever told?

So what the fuck with our cultural default to jealousy and ill-wishing? Why, when we see a beautiful woman, do we smirk and pat each other on the back for saying “I hate her?”  Her attractiveness is not at your expense: if a person you were interested in sexually is interested in her, s/he wasn’t that interested in you. Her presence makes no difference in your outcome. By now we’ve figured out that sexual attraction has zip to do with beauty ideals. We don’t criticize men as harshly for success, but they do get prejudged in other ways: I freely admit I automatically assume an SUV driver is a douche until I see some demonstration otherwise. Why, when someone makes an artistic achievement, wins an award, or is somehow proffered recognition, do we automatically go to how somebody else deserves it more – if not ourselves, then someone we project our wishes onto?

Keeping that other person from success, or directing anger at it, does nothing to make you successful.

I am so happy and grateful I get to have this experience. I am overjoyed to be married to a man who actually enjoys things, rather than putting them down. Because I am blessed with a partner that listens to music on the radio and then decides if he likes it, that will watch godawful and great TV shows to find the good stuff instead of carrying on about “the dumbing down of America,” and that thinks about things before he forms an opinion on them – I get to go to Paris. Mike already knows he’s smart. Most of the time, he’s the smartest guy in the room. He doesn’t need to point to the failure of America, show his knowledge of politics or carry on about social injustices to show he’s deep and intelligent. He already knows he is.

I get to go to Paris because I married a man who has nothing to prove. Because he has nothing to prove, he actually likes things, and does not try to make me feel like crap for liking what I like.

After years of relationships and friendships where people only thought they had something serious, important, or of-depth to say when being negative and focusing solely on the negative (notably while doing very little to change it or create their own alternatives) I found a partner that manages to be intelligent, involved, and positive.

It’s his idea to go to Paris. He knew I’ve always wanted to, and rather than filing it away as “chicks are into that stuff,” he wants to go and see for himself. He’s already found multiple engineering things in France he can geek out over.

I’m going to Paris. Thank you to the people that have said “I’m so happy!” “That’s so cool!” “Oooh, check this out!” “Get a doughnut!”

When something awesome happens to you, I promise to say, “How wonderful!”

  1. Blah blah blah, US ridiculous standard of living, not in a more troubled place in the world..blah… – by contextual standards. []
Writing

Twilight: an explanation


The Twilight novels do manage to break every rule about what remotely qualifies as good writing – especially the rule that no character should ever be perfect. Yet Meyer foists oh so perfect Edward upon us, with the whole blood-drinking thing intended as his glaring imperfection, rather than his much more alarming "watch you while you sleep and make all your basic decisions for you" stalker tactics. It’s essentially abstinence porn – erotica for people who guilty or conflicted about sex.

Writing

My writing to-do, and a sort of roundup of what’s up this month

My writing to-do, and a sort of roundup of what's up this month

I know, a lot of you have heard/read this before. For the few of you that haven’t…

In progress: The Spellcasting Picture Book (I know, I know, you’ve heard this quite often) is now available in print over at Amazon.com. If you have a blog – and can send me the link to it – I will be glad to supply you a review copy on the condition that you review the book, with a link back to one of the places a person can obtain it. You can comment here or go through the website contact form. I would also be happy to send a review copy to any metaphysical shops that carry books. I am in the process of contacting as many shops and magazines as I can manage. Why? Because these days, that’s what a writer’s gotta do. I’m also exploring Smashwords, as I believe they may have a fairly friendly setup for bookstores and distributors. I’m new at this, so if you’re an old hat who is finding my stumbling interesting and you know something that could keep me from bumping into a wall or taking out the antique furniture, do be a dear and tell me.

For the grand list of places to get it:

In Print

In Electronic

Further To-do and Ta-da

  • PNC-Minnesota ran my piece on a festival that was caught in a flash flood, that also got picked up on the Wild Hunt. I’m glad that those involved are all OK. It has also led me to think further about the differences between news, public relations, and community sharing. It seems that PR and Community work is about the future, while news is about preserving the past so that we have lessons to draw upon later. I have another interview/piece pending, so I’m making time to follow up with that this week.
  • I have four books to review for Facing North. For those who are unfamiliar, Facing North is a large and growing repository of metaphysical book, card, music and festival reviews. Not only is it useful to people who read heavily (most Pagans) but for those of us who write in the metaphysical field, it’s becoming incredibly useful for market research. The books on deck: the Un-Spell Book by Mya Om, the Witch’s Bag of Tricks by Melanie Marquis, Bridging the Gap: Working Within the Dynamics of Pagan Groups and Society by Crystal Blanton, and Trigger Point Therapy by Donna Finando.
  • Divorcing a Real Witch is in its rewrite phase. I’m always leery of making specific time goals on a work, because feeling rushed causes me to reduce quality. It’s coming. It’s shaping up at this point to be about 60,000 words, give or take, and I have yet to start the online documentary part of the work. It’s already been turned down by an agent, but that’s one agent… who left the field shortly after the rejection. I am also reworking the book proposal, and looking closely at prospective publishers. The reason that I’m hesitant to bring this to a publisher before I do an agent is because, while an agent also expects you to have a marketing plan, it seems like publisher’s demand for an author’s marketing plan is daunting to the point of ridiculous for a first-time book author. The field is messy right now, and the players are changing. Writing metaphysical/mind/body/spirit books has always run counter to what the traditional market does in certain ways, but is just as much subject to the same rules as all other books in other ways. I may be working in a mudslide right now, but the ground is still there somewhere. Part of the reason I’m expending so much energy on the SPB is in preparation for this book: with Borders now out of the picture for market possibilities, I may just need to handsell it. I’d like to have those resources prepared when the time comes.

Other stuff:

Mike and I are planning to go to Paris in September. We’ve been taking beginning French classes, which now has me even more terrified to try speaking with real French people. We haven’t found a hotel, but tickets are booked.  Aside from the tourist stuff, I have no specific plans. If I can find an occult shop, a Daria fan, or places that sell plus-sized clothes, awesome. I won’t have time to go to Grasse, and I’m just not as fascinated by French perfume as I am apparently supposed to be. Mostly, I plan to walk around and take pictures, which is pretty much what I do everywhere I go.

 

Writing

Mini Bullwer-Lytton contest

This is a passage for a mini Bulwer-Lytton contest on Absolute Write. For reference, Bulwer-Lytton was the “it’s a dark and stormy night,” guy.

He found her that morning, casually catapulting the neighbors’ prodigious collection of cats from the fourth story balcony onto the hapless pedestrians below, her elegant fingers wrapping a clip binder at the nape of each kitten while her lilting voice sang delicate songs best forgotten. “Coffee?” he offered, sidestepping an errant cat, narrowly missing the loss of his ear by an inch. She smirked at him, her pouting lips showing shadows of the night’s playful platitudes, and offered him a cat.

Note: DO NOT DO THE ABOVE WITHOUT GUIDANCE FROM A VET. ALSO, CATAPULTING CATS IS FROWNED ON IN MOST CULTURES.

Want more?
We got it. This is part of a monthly blog chain, as other wacky writers try their hand at worst ever opening lines:

orion_mk3http://nonexistentbooks.wordpress.com
AuburnAssassin - http://clairegillian.com
De’s Storieshttp://desstories.blogspot.com

“By now I’m hoping that you have the urge to scratch your eyeballs out.”

dolores hazehttp://dianedooley.wordpress.com/
Horseflyehttp://thecozylittleplot.blogspot.com/
Proachhttp://www.deannaproach.com/
BigWordshttp://bigwords88.wordpress.com/

“The Celestial Wanderer, flagship of the Covenant Of Worlds, had cowered in the Newt Nebula for three solar days before Captain Washington laid down the order to emerge, the cosmic war cannons readied for engagement.”
jkellerfordhttp://jennykellerford.wordpress.com/
xcomplexhttp://arielemerald.blogspot.com/
Ralph Pineshttp://ralfast.wordpress.com/

“She was so nervous that she dove deep into a sea of sesquipedalian loquaciousness in order to extract herself from the precarious conundrum she found herself ensnared in.”
Diana Rajchel – http://blog.dianarajchel.com/
pezie – http://www.erinbrambilla.wordpress.com/
Guardian – http://daewrites.blogspot.com/
egoodlett – http://wordlarceny.blogspot.com/
Alpha Echo – http://writersramblings81.blogspot.com/
Euclid – http://euclid-thoughts.blogspot.com/




Writing

My Llewellyn contributions are out

You can always check this on my website page that lists my publications, but for those who look for ‘em, here’s where you can find me in the 2012 Llewellyn annuals:

Llewellyn Publications

Contributor: Llewellyn’s 2012 Magical Almanac: Inner Demons: When You Are the Bump in the Night
Contributor: Llewellyn’s 2012 Herbal Almanac: the Future of Herbs
Contributor: Llewellyn’s Witches’ Calendar 2012: Applying Your Apps: Magical Tips for Smartphone Use

And remember – it’s not the end of the world. It’s the end of the world as we know it. My best are against giant meteors or aliens. Maybe someone will come up with an alternative fuel that works with planes. The pilot I chatted with at Dogwood Coffee was not optimistic, alas.

I have an extra copy of each. The Witches’ Calendar got a touch beat up, but is still usable. Make me an offer, and they’re yours.

 

Pagan Culture Writing

The Spellcasting Picture Book

The Spellcasting Picture Book

I’m pleased to announce that the Spellcasting Picture Book is now available on Barnes and Noble Nook, as well as on Kindle – US and UK. I highly recommend you get it in color wherever/whenever you can. Pricing starts at .99 cents, so it’s a good one to grab. I’ve had a tremendous amount of fun working on it, and I’m really hoping that you all have fun reading it!

You can see the table of contents on my static site page. A print version will be available later this month.

In the meantime, please share this anywhere you can with anyone who has an interest – it’s a fun bit of color for anyone who needs a little zap in life!


Art the Big Picture Writing

What came first: the chicken, the egg, the art, or the capitalism?

IMG_9373

Aristotle pointed out that while the egg was all potential, the chicken was an actual chicken, and so its importance in the universe was more important. After all, not all eggs hatch. While there is a universe to discuss about chickens, eggs and betting on a person’s potential over a person’s actuality, right now I’d like to bring this around to art and capitalism.

There is a school of thought that you are not a “real” artist until you sell your work, and unless your work sells regularly, your work does not have merit. Ergo, money alone defines your merit as an artist. Despite scores of examples of writers, musicians and artists not appreciated in their own time, we still think of the free market as our defining tool. Yes, it is – because we choose for it to be. But even if I choose to let the free market define my work’s merits (and yes, I actively choose to participate in the system) I do not have the right to insist another person define him or herself by it. While this does not obligate me to buy/support that person just to legitimize him or her (and thus bring that person into the very system s/he resists) it does suggest that the idea that the purchase of artwork legitimizes its validity of art is…flawed.

Not only is art expansive, the stuff we don’t like, often that actively offends us, is still art. Even popular crap like Twilight is art – it’s just bad art. I believe certain moral conventions should place restrictions on art when it comes to harm of life and limb – there’s no excuse for a snuff film or child pornography no matter what your personal religion or creed -  and the stuff we hate is stuff we personally wouldn’t pay for.

It came to me very simply as I wandered around my favorite museum: art came before we even had capitalism.

People began to feel a need to create something besides babies and food before we even had a concept of leisure. The cave painters didn’t see their work as a way to kill some free time, they saw it as a way to transmit vital information about survival (Probably. We can’t really know without being there, and I guess you kind of had to be there.) Much of the ancient artifacts that decorated royal courts and like did indeed add beauty, but were made just as much for the transmission of history as they were for the possible survival of the artisan. The Vatican can’t even sell its art to raise funds for the waterfalls of lawsuits against the Catholic church because the artwork it stores was created for the glory of God, and is therefore not the church’s to sell.  It’s unclear whether the artisans that created that work ever received payment for their creation – likely some did, and some did not.

Artists were important as purveyors of information, as ways to remind ourselves of stuff we needed to know so that we didn’t have to learn the hard way “that lion wants to eat you, too,” every single generation. People created art before there was ever a capitalist system in which to support that art. Those of us of later generations who find this artwork of previous generations don’t typically ask, “Yeah, but how much did that guy get paid to make that?” If we find out he wasn’t paid, we don’t just dismiss it.

This is not to say that artists shouldn’t get paid. No person should EVER be expected to “live on dedication.” Dedication is very poor in vitamins.

But using payment as a yardstick for whether or not something qualifies as art is not a useful system, not for the artist, and not for the person making the purchase.

While the entire question of “What is art?” is pretentious and tiresome, for those of us that try to make a living because our creative needs allow us no other choice, it’s also an unavoidable question in someone else. Not us. Payment is not what defines art, and not what legitimizes an artist. It is an identity you can assume or not, and it is one of those identities people you know will try to control, especially when a)it’s not their business to make ANY such decision for you and b)they struggle with their own identity issues related to art and creativity. I once had someone tell me as a writer I am a “craftsperson” and not an “artist.” This is, of course, absolute bullshit.

I don’t know, and I don’t care what defines art. You yourself know what makes you an artist and whether that rings true. I just know it has nothing to do with whether you sell that first piece.

Writing

Writing to-do and a sanity exercise

So that list of writing to-dos I posted last week?

Yeah, didn’t happen. Instead I followed my impulse to bury myself in a bunch of books in divorce, body language and emotional intelligence. Some of this is intended to help me with writing Divorcing a Real Witch, and some just to make my life easier. Now I get the additional fun of finding a computer program that lets me organize those notes so I can see them easily. Sure, I could do it the “old fashioned way” but since that’s not really how I process information, I don’t see any use in torturing myself. I also came down with a cold, and since my immune system is going nuts, I’m breaking out in even worse hives than normal.

In the process of all that note-taking, I found an exercise in the book Spiritual Divorce by Debbie Ford that applies to far more than just divorce. She calls the exercise “fact or fiction.” I personally reframe it as “facts, feelings, fears” because fear likes to hide behind other emotions that manifest in this exercise. The idea is to help you refocus on what is actually happening, rather than allowing your emotions to run away with you and do further damage to people who aren’t you and therefore do not share what you are experiencing:

When in a situation where you’re getting upset, write down the facts. The facts are what has actually been said, what has actually been done, what has actually happened. Not how you feel about these things, and NOT the meanings you extrapolate from them.

Just the facts, ma’am.

For example, you disagree with a coworker about what fulfilling a deadline means. Your coworker thinks you should both work late. You think the deadline should be pushed.

Here’s what might go through your head:

  • Your coworker doesn’t care about you or your family needs.
  • Your coworker wants you to work late on the project.
  • Your coworker is trying to kiss butt for a promotion, using your hard work to do it.
  • You asked for the deadline to be pushed back.
  • The deadline is not a decision that you or your coworker have control over.
  • Your coworker is trying to “be the boss.”

OK, so separating out the facts from the feelings (or fictions, as Ford might call them):

  • Your coworker doesn’t care about you or your family needs. Emotional reaction, not fact. Your coworker has said nothing about this to you. Believe it or not, most people don’t keep these attitudes to themselves when they actually have them.
  • Your coworker wants you to work late on the project.
  • Your coworker is trying to kiss butt for a promotion, using your hard work to do it. Emotional reaction, not fact. Your coworker has said nothing about this to you.
  • You asked for the deadline to be pushed back.
  • The deadline is not a decision that you or your coworker have control over.
  • Your coworker is trying to “be the boss.” Emotional reaction, not fact.

I am not advocating you ignore your emotions here.  Emotions are there to inform you. In this case, the emotions are informing theoretical you that you do NOT want to work late, and that you feel uncomfortable about the way work and deadlines are distributed between yourself and your coworker. An empathetic response to your coworker might get a bigger picture – asking questions as “What is your reasoning behind working late?” and cooperative, co-creative questions like “Can we redistribute the workload so it’s easier on both of us?” are a better approach than biting your tongue, putting your head down, and building up a resentment toward the coworker who most likely just wants to go home, too. Unless your coworker has actually said something about this project getting her career advancement, this is all your own self-talk and not only has no bearing on your interaction with your coworker, it creates drama that gets in the way of doing a good job and then going home and forgetting about work. read more »

Bad Behavior has blocked 657 access attempts in the last 7 days.

MySQL query error