Tag: Pagan publishing

A sobering look at best-selling Pagan titles

A sobering look at best-selling Pagan titles

the Monkey on My Back
the Monkey on My Back (Photo credit: magickalrealism)
Cover of "Living Wicca: A Further Guide f...
Cover via Amazon

An article on Scott Cunningham’s dynamic-changing book Living Wicca pointed out that, as a best-selling title on the subject, it sold 400,000 copies.

For the Pagan genre, that’s huge. For a lot of books in any genre, that’s huge. But it comes nowhere near best-seller category. While there’s no consistent number for what makes a bestseller – you just need to outsell the other guys – 400K over the lifetime of a book in print is smallish. Being a “mid-list” author – someone with middling/mediocre sales takes selling 5,000 books and that may change even more now that self-publishing is not a bank-breaking endeavor. We don’t need to go over how little authors make back from those sales – copy editors, ISBN assigners, cover designers, etc. all require feeding and visits to the vet, so of course, a good chunk of money rightfully does go back to the publisher.

These books also came out before the noise-to-message ratio rose exponentially. The same story mentioned Starhawk’s Spiral Dance, considered a seminal (pardon the word choice) book on feminist spirituality in the 1970s came in behind it at 350,000. Out of curiosity, I also looked up the much-reviled To Ride a Silver Broomstick by Silver Ravenwolf because I had heard it was considered a knockout bestseller. The book has sold 300,000 copies to date.

I’m not sure if that’s sobering or relieving. I’m well aware that marketing my book Divorcing a Real Witch is going to take some hump-busting. I’m also obligated to consider the following factors in the sales of the above books:

  1. This doesn’t take total distribution into account. By that, I am referring to piracy, legitimate book lending, and the circulation of used books.
  2. These books have all sold internationally. The above includes standard purchases in the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia without taking into account the languages these books have been translated into.  Given that the US has 330 million people, which seems huge until you realize our geographic distribution creates millions of small towns that are often culturally invasive when it comes to religion and religious questioning (or absolutely anything else that might make those in power think they themselves aren’t normal) and that people in Australia still have to fight tooth and nail to get anything on Pagan subjects they don’t make themselves, that’s still a pretty small number to chop off for those who can’t safely get access to the book.
  3. All of these were published at a time when publishing conditions were completely different than they are now.

Still, the above are arguably the three worldwide best-sellers on the subject. Compared to the Harry Potter series (chosen because of its popularity among the Pagan set AND because it started publication in 1997, close to Ravenwolf’s 1995 book) these are … tiny. The Potter series sold 450 million, and still counting. Now, the specialization of the information combined with marketing practices – most books, even formally published books are now marketed solely by their authors – will dilute the odds further. And I’m not writing a Living Wicca. But just looking at those numbers tells me that whatever I’m doing, it’s really going to be an eye-opener about how much publishing has changed since I sold my first article to Llewellyn in 1999.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Maybe we’ve gone a little too far on that academics bent

Maybe we’ve gone a little too far on that academics bent

Loring Park Pedestrian BridgeI am, once again, slogging my way through a thick academic book for the sake of a review. I used to slog through these books of my own accord, all the time. I’ve actually earned myself a reputation as the “academic reviewer” though I’m easily left in the dust by the staff of the Pomegranate, et. al. I never did finish my graduate degree, and it was a fluffy-old MFA I was working on anyway. ((Frankly, I don’t think I could get the letters of recommendation I need to go back and finish, and I’d want to switch to sociology if I did go back.))

After hundreds of thorough readings, long bouts of concern for my brain-organ as I retained nothing from those readings, and all too often trying to hide that I was bored to tears while one or another such expert set out to prove how smart he or she is I’ve finally achieved the confidence to say this out loud.

A lot of academic writing is just bad.

It’s the fallacy that if it’s fun/easy to read, it’s somehow not as smart. You can be perfectly intelligent and coherent. You can even express an idea or ten of your own around all those quotes demonstrating where your formative ideas came from. I daresay that once you’ve gotten past the hoops of higher education and the disapproving expressions of certain tenured (read: stagnant) professors that you might even have a little fun with your subject.

That’s right, I said it. Academic writing should still be fun.

But I tend to be a heretic in every crowd I run with, so if you’re going to use flamethrowers, be prepared to be met with asbestos lingerie.

I realize that much of the call for this in pagandom is a response to the pure drek churned out between the 70s up to now. Bad history and poor fact checking is what it is, but even so, I think it’s possible to write in an entertaining, informative way while preserving factual accuracy. Right now it seems like you’re either red state or blue state: you can write about personal experience, mistakes and how-tos or you can be Taken Very Seriously and write only about what other scholars have to say about the subject; if you’re lucky you might even throw in a page or two about something you dug out of the mud. ((I’m referring to archaeological digs, not celebrity gossip.))

My interest in the academic was fear and a need for approval much of my life seems to be about overcoming. Once upon a time I wanted to be Taken Very Seriously. But I’m starting to not care. After seeing the sheer crazy of some Very Serious people up close and personal, I’m backing away and trying to write more from my heart because therein truth and sanity lie. Maybe it’s my training in creative nonfiction – I think it’s more important that what I write be read than that it be important.

Pagan book recommendation:not really Pagan: the Witch of Portobello

Pagan book recommendation:not really Pagan: the Witch of Portobello

I am regrettably out of the loop these days about what’s coming out on the neopagan/occult book market. I’m also aware of the irony of this, since I still write book reviews and at one point I was on the mailing list for all the major occult publishers and a few of the minor ones, too. There are a lot of reasons for this, the main one being the two book cases and stack on the floor of books I have yet to read, some which have been waiting for me for quite literally a decade. Still, once in awhile a book, fiction or non, makes it through my filters. The Witch of Portobello is definitely one of those books.

It is the life story of a woman who chooses unconventional methods to live the truest relationship to God she can conceive. Told from the point of view of a reporter who is in love with her, her origins and how she becomes who she is is a tale to inspire the most determined nonconformist in all of us.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira