Archives: Pagan Culture

Magic: For humanity or for survival? #paganvalues

June 14, 2013 by di | 1 Comment | Filed in Pagan Culture
Tarot card from the Rider-Waite tarot deck, al...

Tarot card from the Rider-Waite tarot deck, also known as the Rider-Waite-Smith deck. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There’s a conversation floating around the Paganosphere/magic worker’s sphere right now about whether magical paths are about service to mankind or about survival.

Yes.

Ultimately how magic gets uses is a discussion of privilege. No matter how incisive a view, parts of it get ugly. This is in part because those who consider using magic for personal gain are almost always the ones who live in a situation that allows them to see magic as optional.

There’s a lot of abstractions thrown around by the “for enlightenment” crowd. Lots of “raising global consciousness” and lots of “let’s send energy to.” There’s nothing wrong at all with that outlook. Using magic to raise consciousness and make people healthier and happier is always a good plan. You can’t treat a disease until you’re conscious of it.

But the people that do have that outlook do tend to look down on those who use magic for survival. I can’t quote statistics here – it’s just a general feeling based on the declarations of the more vocal .

I think there’s a LOT wrong with that outlook – not because it’s wrong to want people to live better and be happier, but because it’s a viewpoint based mostly (but not totally) on white privilege, class privilege, getting-there-first privilege, etc. To be blunt, it’s participating in a class war. Telling people with serious problems not to use magic to fulfill their daily needs because it’s “lesser” is crappy. Actually, saying the same thing to someone with relatively more privilege who still prefers a little magical insurance is still crappy.

Some of this is, unavoidably, personal. Anyone who claims total objectivity about magical society and magical practice will, at some point, be bitchslapped by the ghost of Crowley.

My frame of reference

My socio-economic and class status has changed dramatically since I started practicing witchcraft at the tender age of 19. I got to where I am with a great deal of work both magical and not. Ultimately I think magic did far more for me than traditional forms of hard work. Also, I really did work at magic with a great deal more effort than my immediate peers at the time.

I got into magic because my back was against a wall – I’m far from the first of recent essayists to say so. I needed money for college. The people in my life did not want me to have it  and were doing all they could to erode any independence I achieved. I could see, though at the time could not verbalize, that it wasn’t just college privilege at stake. My basic adult autonomy – and from there, ability to live in a violence free environment of my choosing – was in danger. Desperate to get any help I could, I cast a series of spells.

Now I’m here, relatively independent and writing about it.

These days I tend to hang out more with the global consciousness types. They differ a bit from what I consider the Pagan subspecies. There’s more actual unity and tolerance for differing perspectives – I can discuss ideas (as long as I veer off veganism) and most discussions end up in discussions, not in the borderline assaults I’ve come to associate with about one third of all my Pagan-based interactions.

Most are put-their-money-where-their-hearts-are types; while I do not think the language I can speak it. I admire their ability to walk away from the privileges granted them in a normal white life in favor of stepping outside of society to make society better.

But they’re also, for the most part, doing it from places of safety. They have family, friends and money to support them when they want to take off on global “help the world” journeys. They may show up for Habitat for Humanity stuff and they have the freedom to go on complicated diets based on what’s trendy at the coop. They don’t need magic to make these things happen – because they already have it. I have no idea whether their hearts go to their local communities – if, say, the New Ager in dance group with me sends as much energy to North Minneapolis as s/he does to Africa – and if that person chooses to send internationally over nationally I really don’t have a moral judgment on that. Carbon based lifeforms have infinite connection; both good and bad reaches all of us somehow, sometime. Whatever they’re doing, it’s either good or entirely benign – I can live with either.

But these are also not people I discuss magic use with all that much. They are doing as they see fit and I don’t talk about myself or my practices with them unless they ask me directly. We don’t talk about the magic I do for myself on a regular basis – the stuff I do to protect myself, to make sure I can maintain some independence however minimal, the stuff I do just to feel better sometimes. While that magic itself has a lot of ethical guidelines surrounding it its very existence – the very act of judging another person for doing magic for him or herself – is the very essence of the destructive missionary. To become so sure of your own moral rightness is to forget what happens when it’s a matter of living or not living. When you forget that, you  end up with, say, the equivalent of a destroyed Africa.

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

#paganvalues The artificial construct of tradition

June 12, 2013 by di | No Comments | Filed in Pagan Culture
Polski: kolacja wigilijna - dania

Polski: kolacja wigilijna – dania (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Tradition is a big deal among Pagans. Your tradition defines your religion, how you practice, what you practice, your morals – sometimes even your lifestyle. It’s divisive and inclusive all at the same time.

That way of casting a circle, that method of purification, that ritual for blessing an athame – there is more than one way to do all of those things. Do each one according to set words, set rituals – each one of those steps and choices makes up a tradition.

It’s also an artificial construct. None of these rules are divinely handed down. They are created by people, guided by the gods or not, to deal with immediate concerns. Sometimes the practice stays after the concern has gone. Sometimes it creates additional concerns.

I’ve always found the popularity of tradition in a religious grouping that cherishes so much nature peculiar. Tradition isn’t physics. It’s not about whether the magic works or not – it’s about upholding inventions that work until they don’tanymore. Some traditions, even among Pagans, go so far as to say things like “Christian prayer doesn’t have power,” or “Science will catch up to magic!” as part of their official beliefs. It’s strange, inappropriate to the big picture religious people ostensibly uphold. Sometimes it feels like the clamor for tradition has gotten so loud that few people actually practice any actual magic – it takes too much energy to practice a tradition instead.

I’ve always seen tradition as a double-edged sword.

It preserves. It also limits. Limitation can help set boundaries. It can also prevent learning when applied wrong.

The insistence that tradition matters isn’t appropriate to all situations.  To insist on following a “tradition of my ancestors” would be as much of a disaster as declaring Christianity the state religion in the US. My ancestors did a lot of stuff that does not fly in the 21st century. It served then but just because it did doesn’t mean it applies to now. Oh, some stuff does – like pausing to remember the ancestors. But reliving their lives does not seem like a good way to learn anything.

To insist that one Wiccan tradition is more correct than the other also troubles me – it seems that if the gods show up, it’s not for the page justification or because the athame got dunked in the chalice just right.

 

Tags: , , ,

The ancestors: a vignette

June 6, 2013 by di | No Comments | Filed in Pagan Culture, Poetry

Connecting genes, helix, labryinth
crawled out, crawled back again up the spiral to source -
we are pooled from the same saltwater
that passes through our bodies on its way to the sky.

The call, it came from my lips somehow:
“You are ALL my ancestors!”

From the ocean-salty blood,
the dirt of  bones
a voice responded:
“Oh thank God. We have so much love to give you.”

The skies opened up,
the ancestors poured love on me
blood unto my body,
unto the earth,
into the roots that sustain

- Diana Rajchel

Tags: , ,

Wicca and the Ego #paganvalues

June 5, 2013 by di | 1 Comment | Filed in Pagan Culture
The Tree of Life

The Tree of Life (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

According to the movie Revolver, people will do insane things to protect their ego, mistaking it for their true selves.  As a person attempts to ascend the tree of life the ego often pulls that person off the ascent. I’m inclined to believe this.

It makes the movie a mind-bending bummer.

Watch it anyway. You’ll be just as confused as I am, and likely you’ll want to share.

One of things it points out is that Christians (among others) concoct the devil as a way of displacing blame for acts of evil done to protect the evil. The Rider-Waite tarot takes a more honest view: the interpretation of the devil is usually “Your ego makes you STUPID.” You are the devil. You are chained by beliefs you create explicitly to avoid responsibility, or to avoid acknowledging unpleasant truths. The Devil = DENIAL.

Denying truths never does a thing to change them.

Wicca ditches the whole devil mythos – first of all, we aren’t Christian, and Christian morality concepts are none of our business even as we live in a culture that views them as standard fare. Second, as I once said in irritation to one of those standard fare Christians, “We don’t need the devil when we have ourselves.” The human ego is the source of all evil. Not money. Not sex. Not even religion. We, human beings, commit acts of hate, of malice, and of cruelty, sometimes even for the sake of it in order to reinforce the self-image we create for ourselves.

The Ego runs a litany of deny, deny, deny, suppress, suppress, suppress  – and lie to yourself when you can’t find any other way out of owning some act you performed that made the world a worse place to be. Being Wiccan – or any other kind of Pagan – does nothing to make you immune to this. But there’s also no devil to collect your blame.

Wicca isn’t exactly an enlightenment religion – we look forward, even down into the taproots, rather than up. The mysteries lie in where and how we share the world. Even so, stilling the ego seems to make the work inherent in this spirituality happier if not easier. It means a quieter mind during meditation. It means the ability to celebrate the happiness of others. It means not, in any way, winding up like the characters in Revolver.

That in itself seems like a strong reason to ditch the ego and leave the Devil’s chains empty.

Tags: ,

Religious Bigotry Among the Pagans #paganvalues

June 4, 2013 by di | No Comments | Filed in Pagan Culture

[Dear Geoffrey – yes, I prestacked the deck this time. I drafted this on March 23, 2012.)

Map showing the prevalence of Abrahamic (pink)...

Map showing the prevalence of Abrahamic (pink) and Dharmic religions (yellow) in each country. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

At least some of my regular readers have seen that chart, right? The one that maps what Pagans/occultists look down on what other Pagans? The online FAQ about it seems to forbid reprinting/redistribution, so alas, I can’t give you the pretty chart to see here. It’s well worth a look, though.

The chart is funny, because it’s true. That infographic is very accurate, and I know I’ve experienced being the looked down upon while also looking down upon someone else. I’ve even had it happen at the same time, as we all drank from the same pot of coffee. (more…)

Tags: ,

Big scandals and smallish communities: thoughts on the rescue of Berry, DeJesus and Knight

May 7, 2013 by di | Comments Off | Filed in Journalism, Pagan Culture

There’s no way to adequately analyze the onscreen interview with hostage rescuer Charles Ramsey. In his television interview, he hit the social and class layers better than any news anchor could – and points to him for making the guy interviewing him uncomfortable. There’s no confrontation more necessary than that borne of total honesty.1

Then there’s the side twist: alleged (we have to say that until charges are pressed – let’s say someone else put those women in his basement without his knowledge) kidnapper Ariel Castro’s own son (aka Anthony Castro) wrote one of the first articles covering the disappearance of Giselle DeJesus. It’s unclear whether the younger Castro was living with his father at the time – if he lived with his mother or in dorms, a whole lot of stuff could have gone on without him knowing. Whether he likes it or not, the details of his own connection and his potential culpability will be examined by both the public and the law in the coming months and even years.

It’s going to be an issue that journalists, especially journalists in small communities, must pay attention to. It’s unclear whether the younger Castro is still a working journalist. If he is, he would have to be recused from covering anything related to this story because his position is conflict of interest – he is a potential source.

What becomes foggier is people of closer but not as direct relationships. Ramsey himself had a social relationship with the kidnapper – until he discovered the women hidden in the man’s basement.

This extreme example for Anthony Castro is a regular conundrum for Pagans reporting on Pagan-related news. While the Pagan umbrella is larger than we can visibly see (because of so many people that aren’t even out to other Pagans) we operate like it’s all a very small community. On a hopefully metaphorical level, we are the neighbor that reports the kidnapper or the kidnapper’s son whenever there’s something remotely controversial to report. For those of us that are out, we’re too small a community per geographic area and too close together to avoid this.

To not report something of that magnitude – to remain silent – is in itself unethical, more unethical than crossing the lines of disinterest and objectivity to make that news known. Abusive people count on silence; it’s why the bad people that get into Paganism seeking new victims are so fond of the misuse of “To be silent” from the commands of the Magi.

The smaller the community, the less the usual exclusions apply. What if the person in the younger Castro’s position were the only person available to report on the event? What if the person in Ramsey’s position were the only one available? What then? What if only one of the victims was available to report on what had been done? That could actually happen, especially in small communities. Then the question raised would be even more complex. Yes, it would clearly be a biased source – but the ethical duty of an activist press is to take power away from the person who committed the abuse in the first place. Giving a victim a voice, even a biased voice would be more ethical in that situation than remaining silent for the sake of objectivity. Of course, the abuser would not think so – but that’s how abusive people think.

There is no specific Pagan scandal I am thinking of or comparing as I write this. But this situation makes me think of several mini-scandals, over years, that have fit this pattern of strange connection. When there is no absolute right thing to do, then transparency is the closest of the mostly-right things to do.

Stories will come to Pagans – hopefully not of the kidnapping extreme – and the connections will be close. I hope that we are prepared for it when it comes.

  1. Also, don’t assume the siren/momentary panic is him doing something illegal – having known people that lived in Kabrini Green in the 90s, police in certain neighborhoods are often alarmingly non-discriminatory about arresting every black man in sight when organizing a lineup. Even if it’s probable or the guy has a record, it may not be what you assume. []

Tags:

#mypagantheology–condensed soup version

May 1, 2013 by di | Comments Off | Filed in Pagan Culture
NYC - MoMA: Andy Warhol's Campbell's Soup Cans

NYC – MoMA: Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans (Photo credit: wallyg)

Teo Bishop has started a project to crowdsource Pagan theology. Along with asking people to tweet it or comment about it on the Wild Hunt, he has asked those of us who blog to create posts also explaining our own theology.

So here goes my interpretation:

The way I see it, Pagan itself is NOT a theology. It is an expansive category term for a whole BUNCH of theologies. Those who identify as “generically Pagan” rather than as Wiccan, Druid, Hellenic, etc. have, from what I have gathered, a sort of universalist God/Godess view. That was popular in the 1990s with more explicit gravitation towards defined traditions with defined theologies happening at the turn of the 21st century.

I am American Eclectic Wiccan. I am also Gnostic.

So … we’re all right, and wrong, and won’t know until we die, and can talk to God about not knowing God right now. Also, there are lots of them. And God is also female … and male… and genderless… fat and thin, ugly and pretty, gay,straight, bi, asexual, in me, in you, in the closet, under our beds… all of it.

The popular word for that conception among Wiccans is “immanent.” For those of us who pray, it’s praying forward rather than up or down.

There is no way I can condense the whole of any theology, let alone a specifically non-dogmatic theology into a single blog post. So the best I can do is give a series of sentences that exist on my internal theological map.

  • There is no separation between God and nature. God IS nature.
  • God is male and female.
  • Women have the same inherent holiness, divinity1, intelligence, capacity for evil and capacity for good as men.
  • Gender is a social construct and participation is voluntary. There is no “naturally, as men” or “naturally, as women.”
  • There are also multiple beings called gods, that are part of the universe. The following are theories about them, not conclusions:
  • That these are beings that were once human that ascended to godhood
  • That they have always been gods, beings separate from humanity
  • That they are manifestations of the immanent divinity, not really separate but separated for the sake of humanity’s ability to perceive
  • That they are unique, separate entities and have really been around since the dawn of our known time; all that immanence stuff is to make ourselves feel better
  • Holy books may have wisdom, but also have a lot of manipulations and outright lies in them. Just as we view books written by our own with critical thought and skepticism, we also view books from other faiths with the same critical thought and skepticism.
  • The discoveries of science takes precedence over religious beliefs.
  • There is life after death. Details are undetermined. Some like the idea of Summerlands, but for those of us that don’t subscribe to the Celtic mythos, this is still up on the air.
  • Reincarnation happens. Details – animal or human, plant or mineral, are also undetermined.
  • There is energy inherent in all things – even the synthesized material we use came from nature.
  • Animism is acceptable, especially from an immanent deity perspective.
  • Faith may well be a neurological truth, much like sexual orientation.
  • Other religions exist for a reason, and speak to people that need them. As long as the religion makes someone’s life better, it is worth supporting that person in his/her own faith.
  • Religion is not a competition – those who try to win by converting to their faiths are sinning against themselves. Attempts at conversion are immoral.
  • “Harm” is used in place of sin. It is defined as doing active damage to others. “Sin” focuses on sex; non-harmful (100% consensual legal/of age) sex is sacred with our without marriage in Wicca.
  • Practice of magic and divination is not required but is acceptable. It is viewed as a natural adjunct to taking responsibility for the life you have been given (your own.)
  • Of course it’s all much more complicated than that – and that’s just what lives in my own head and heart. But as a starter list, it’s a place to work from.

    1. this is not the same as holy []

    Tags: ,

    Wherein the Pagan Newswire Collective got screwed: my comments

    April 9, 2013 by di | Comments Off | Filed in Pagan Culture
    English: Council Member Dan Halloran, (R) New ...

    Dan Halloran is a Republican city council member who is caught in a bribery scandal. He happens to practice the Theodish religion, which falls under the Pagan religious umbrella (or on the spectrum, if you prefer.) To my knowledge, the Theodish, like most religions, strongly disapprove of bribe-taking.

    So this happened:

     

    The Wild Hunt: How I Was Suckered by a Tabloid and Leading Horses to Water in reference to the New York Post’s article on Dan Halloran.  To summarize, Jason Pitzl-Waters decided, based on a very polite approach by the reporter M.L. Nestal, to overlook the Post’s reputation as reliable birdcage liner and actually help the guy out on writing about Halloran’s religion. So he referred him to longtime media professional and PNC Managing editor Cara Schulz. The uptake of the situation is that rather than focus on how and whether Halloran himself is corrupt, the article looks at his “super weird religion.” Not only did he betray the trust of two acknowledged leaders in the Pagan community, he did everything he could to maliciously misrepresent a faith.

     

    I feel like I need to say something here even though I wasn’t involved with this incident. I don’t talk much here about my role with the PNC because I don’t do as much as I would like for them and what I do contribute is consciously in baby steps. Because I have a portfolio career1 so I often work in my role as Executive Editor once a month rather than the once a week minimum that’s ideal. I took the gig because it makes me feel like my degree in mass communications and journalism isn’t a total waste. Right now I’m focusing on finding more writers that can establish local bureaus – and trying very slowly and carefully to get up a platform that allows for international writers and global distribution of handpicked stories. But only after everything else I’m doing – like that book I’ve spent eight years writing.  I’m a sounding board for local bureaus, but not an authority: it’s a collective so there isn’t an authoritative system at hand.

     

    Pitzl-Waters and Schulz do amazing work every single day, most of it going unseen by the public. As editor-in-chief and managing editor respectively, I do attribute to them much of the slow societal shift in consciousness that labels the Pagan multi-religious umbrella as “real religions” and not “collection of kooks.” My own work, aside from volunteer finding at the moment, is more on using my old-school journalism and research skills to explain difference to our community between libel, slander, and saying something somebody doesn’t like that is true and that genuinely needs to be said. It’s not always pleasant but for the most part it is a very rewarding volunteer gig. What I do is internal – I don’t have my sanity or legitimacy publicly questioned to the degree that both of these people do.

    To my mind, the Western Pagan community has potential to model multi-religious co-existence for the rest of the world and Pitzl-Water and Schulz are significant in making that happen.

     

    When it comes to what happened with the Halloran story, I don’t think Pitzl-Waters or Schulz failed the Pagan community in any way. They did their jobs. Alas, you can’t ethically control another human being and mind-reading/future-predicting is not a universal talent among Pagans. So unless it’s fair for Pitzl-Waters to blame himself for not seeing the future (it’s not) then the failure is on how the New York Post betrayed the trust of the PNC.

     

    I have worked with guys like M.L. Nestal before. My very first Pagan Pride in Mankato, the local TV station ran an interview with me about Wiccan religious practices. The first showing had clips from the Craft, despite my making it very clear the Craft had very little relevance to actual practices. The next showing, later on, had the Craft clips thrown out after I made an angry call to the producer. They instead opted to show us running around in a circle looking a bit dorky, and mis-pronounced Wicca as “Wicker.”

     

    It could very well have been worse. I happened to have a friend take a video of myself being interviewed. The reporter, knowing this, didn’t doctor or add any comment after the story because of it. When my university newspaper interviewed me, I also taped the interview – and there was no messing around. I did, however, reject the overture from the local Christian radio station that came after. Given their angle, education is NOT what they were after. That one was easy to see – all I had to do was listen to a few of their programs.

     

    But the Post is harder to predict. Sometimes, for the fun of it, they offer a balanced approach. I see their vacillations and reversals all the time when they report on the plus size fashion industry – I can guess that if we monitored their reporting on minority religions the behavior is the same. The Post is a casino where you bet your trust. You might get smal payouts from time to time. But for the most part, the house always wins.

     

    Even if Schulz had recorded the entire interactions with Nestal he probably would have written the exact same thing. The Post is turn of the 19th century old school in its journalistic approach, and Nestal stayed true to their concept that ethical behaviors only apply to those that they deem “the normal people.”

     

    I do not believe that the PNC failed in its mission in any way. They were approached for assistance in story research. They gave that help. PNC is not responsible for how that information is used, although we can hope that reporters with an eye to long-term sourcing will think about the long-term: as I was told sharply in my press ethics class many years ago, “Don’t EVER burn a source.”

     

     

    1. I do more than one thing and I have to keep doing more than one thing to keep from getting stuck doing only one thing []

    Tags: , ,

    Two keys to meditation

    March 19, 2013 by di | Comments Off | Filed in Pagan Culture
    Meditation

    Meditation (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    This was cut from an article submitted to Llewellyn annuals for 2014. I still wanted to share it, so here it is.

     The Two Keys

    1. The ability to concentrate on a single idea or object.
    2. The ability to distract your attention from other thoughts, usually by introducing new thoughts.

    Controlling your own thoughts seems almost as mad as the madness of completely uncontrolled thoughts! Yet mind control – positive mind control – begins in meditation. In this way, you take control of your own mind.

    Because most don’t know what meditation is supposed to feel like, they expect blissful relaxation where lotuses appear while locusts hum. Those, however, who have a few years of experience in meditation built up know that time outs for the mind are not always peaceful or relaxing.

    Meditation is a skill. It does involve struggle, setbacks, forgetting and remembering. It may never come easily.

    Mosquitoes will bite you while you’re aligning your chakras, the phone will ring just as you get to that point where you can feel an actual “drop down” and your kids will need your help with an overflowing toilet just as you depart on the bliss wagon. That – if the bliss wagon arrives at all. It helps when establishing practice to realize that meditation feels different for everyone. Some do notice a sense of physical relaxation in their bodies. Other people that meditate report no physical changes. These latter meditators only realize that the practice makes a difference when they find their blood pressure doesn’t spike in stressful situations.

    Meditation and boredom go hand-in-hand. People do not handle boredom well – we medicate against it in every way possible. So this leads to the tricky part that makes meditation both so miraculous and so banal: boredom is a form of pain. If you feel bored, you are expressing pain. Meditation ultimately takes this base form of pain and turns it into a spiritual practice, and where possible, boredom via meditation leads through alchemy into pleasure. Pleasure itself does require concentration, but we don’t mind it – pleasure is not usually stressful.

    Tags: ,

    My feminism, my paganism

    March 13, 2013 by di | Comments Off | Filed in Pagan Culture
    English: One of the symbols of German Women's ...

    English: One of the symbols of German Women’s movement (from the 1970s) Deutsch: Ein Logo der deutschen Frauenbewegung (aus den 70er Jahren) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

    From 1998-2004, I was heavily involved in the Pagan movement of my generation. It’s fallen off – I’m not teaching classes or marching marches. I’m writing, mostly, often feeling too unsafe in a crowd of my own to spend more than symbolic time with any fellow Pagan.

    I’ve come to consider Paganism in the United States not a singular historical movement, but a series of movements brought by each group of Pagans within a generation. Our philosophies may look similar, but our experiences getting to them differ. For example, I have never heard a Pagan in my age-range claim positive gain by excluding men from ritual. At the same time, the challenges feminists, with or without faith, are the same: entitlement, patriarchy, male privilege. But how people develop the attitudes we fight with, and how we experience these attitudes and assumptions is different every time.

    A feminist from the 1960s era never navigated the text-message bailout or booty calls via email. The mechanics of sex remains stable but the social culture has changed as women are presumably allowed to use many of the same tools, tricks and manipulations as men.

    Male privilege was just a pat assumption of the overarching culture from the 1960s through the 1980s. Male privilege for generation X and Y stems more from women’s competition with each other as so many act out on the unconscious and superfluous belief that men are necessary not just for species survival but for social survival

    That these particular women figuratively screw themselves while literally getting screwed is something only a few recognize. ((Much of this “Why aren’t we hearing about abused men? etc. is happening after men are, in fact, being treated to the same consequences as the other 51% of the population. For them, equality will suck because it means everyone is now equally culpable.)

    Generations XY have nothing to prove by rejecting another gender or a variation within gender, and nothing spiritual to gain from such rejection, either.

    This isn’t an absolute – it falls along a spectrum, and religion of birth is usually the anchor in how far into patriarchy the pendulum swings.

    More rising young Witches and Wiccans are ascending, not to seek personal power as women, but to incorporate a spiritual worldview that involves the things they love the most: the environment, other people, themselves. Many do not even give a thought to their own gender until confronted with someone determined to challenge it according to some fantasy of the “good old days” that that person himself (usually) would not actually enjoy experiencing. It may not be playing out the way perhaps Starhawk envisioned, but the core intent of our foremothers and forefathers is starting to manifest.

    My journey into Wicca itself was separate from my feminist identity. The idea of a Goddess interested me, but I didn’t find it revolutionary or rebellious – my feeling about it was more of “finally someone’s being honest with me, and with themselves!!!!”
    While I have been since disappointed, the disappointment resides with inevitable human failing, not with any disservice at the hands of the gods I celebrate. I came into Wicca with the idea of feminism as equally inclusive of men and women. The misogyny and homophobia woven into some of the earlier Wiccan traditions came as a surprise to me, and I naturally assumed that most Wiccans had the sense to evolve beyond them as science sped over the old assumptions, negating the absolutism of “feminine” and “masculine.”

    It is only as I have aged into a range that the generations before me “take seriously” that I have learned how much misogyny persists. True to hegemonist form, certain women  will support those beliefs to their own death.

    I was also surprised, but struggled to be understanding, about the traditions that actively exclude men. Patriarchy has socialized forms of purdah for 20th century American women; some extend into the 21st century. I routinely break them, going dancing sans husband or even without the protection of a group. It’s a conscious, political act on my part.

    Women in my age range don’t need our husband’s permission to let a salesman in the house, (we wouldn’t for other reasons) and would be shocked that a partner would even think to demand that kind of authority. In most cases, divorced or at least abandon him if he tried to overstep the line that crosses from relationship into imprisonment.
    This isn’t just a given expectation – men of our generation aren’t just casually given authority, an improvement that these same women fought to create. The authority that remains is in a casually conferred respect, where men feel free to say certain things without being forced to prove themselves while it’s still demanded that women do so. The next generation, most likely, all respect on all sides will simply have to be earned.

    Right now the conflict between inclusion or exclusion of men is as much about honoring what the women requesting the exclusion have gone through as it is about acknowledging how far we’ve come. The male experience of a man born in 1980 differs drastically from one born in 1970 (and is why my partner is chosen from the more recent years.) The female experience and even thoughts about the experience differs even more drastically. Men are no longer blindly obeyed, not because men are “bad” but because it’s an outright stupid idea to blindly obey anyone, male or female. Rachel Berry on Glee said something true -and ten years before it would have been outrageous to the point of scandal: “Girls want sex just as much as guys do.” Girls and boys both want sex – and have equal capacity to control those urges.

    I have never been actively feminist. I’ve never joined a consciously feminist organization, although I regret not joining NOW in college. I find radical feminists strangely behind the times, not because their causes are outdated but because they should be and are not. I do think they need some R&D people embedded with them, people who experiment with different protest, diplomacy, subliminal subversion tactics – if all you do is picket, for instance, it becomes far too easy to become blind to the signs.

    My feminism just is, a core condition of my being. Despite messages all through childhood about how I was to behave a certain way, I remained convicted that I had just as much human worth as any boy.

    It was, without a doubt, a condition that made me open to Wicca as a religious path, but it was not the deciding factor. I only consciously thought about my own feminism when someone else brought it up to me, their projections onto me about it, and I knew two things: my family objected to anything that made me more resistant to their abusive behavior, and women who called themselves feminist often did not have the courage required to genuinely practice it.

    Demanding I be treated with respect by my family was my first radical, unsuccessful act, so breaking with them became my second radical act. (I generally prefer the subversive approach.) This happened not because I am Wiccan, but because I am feminist and I believe in my own worth.

    The message that God was mad at me because I was a woman never came to roost on me; to my mind any God that had me born a woman was culpable for my gender, and since that deity did not consult me on that decision, I sure as hell wasn’t responsible for results and reactions solely based upon myself being female.

    This is my feminism. It does not really define my spiritual values, but it informs it. It does inform my political values because it is simple self-interest to want access to birth control, proper health care and my own bank accounts without needing my husband’s permission.

    Do I believe men should be excluded from ritual? No. Hardly anyone of my generation does. Besides, men – straight, gay, transgender – all need inclusion for social change to genuinely happen.

    Tags: