Pagan/Magical Values: the bad ideas edition
June 29, 2011 by di | Filed under Pagan Culture.- #paganvalues: Politics and Religion
- #paganvaluesmonth 2011: the nature of evil
- Pagan values month: a roundup
- Pagan/Magical Values: the bad ideas edition
- The core values of neopaganism – as I understand them
- Happiness: the other white light
- A few more values
- Eclectic: Use what works, not whatever the hell you want
- Wicca and suffering
- Pagan Values 2011: Other people’s religions – and lack thereof
- #paganvaluesmonth Pagan Values 2011: 1st week Roundup of Favorites
- Pagan Values Month: She’s Gonna Doooooo Something (Reprise)
- #paganvalues The Double-Edged Sword of Silence
- Please don’t do unto me
- Back to the Pagan Values discussion: Premarital sex
- 2011 Pagan Values Month Roundup week 2
- Situational ethics in Wicca and Divorce
- #paganvalues the truth about consequences
- #paganvalues the Social Contract: Our rights over others, and theirs over us
- #paganvalues The fine art of courteous living
- #paganvalues Feminism
- #paganvalues The Apology, and its receipt
- #paganvalues the Overculture and the Subculture
- #paganvalues month Observations
- #paganvaluesmonth Free Will
- #paganvalues War (unavoidable political discussion)
- #paganvalues Values Change
Just read a writeup of the lover’s intranquility spell. I have a lot of respect for Hoodoo – it is the foundation of most of the magic that Wicca uses, too. And while my own religious ethos is decidedly against calling up denizens of hell because of our high ranking on free will, I think perhaps "it’s a really freaking bad idea" is a much more compelling argument. Things that are just "wrong" or "right" are easily lost in relativism. However, ranking magical spellworking with parallels to an arsenal of weapons can make people stop and really think twice about what they’re doing – especially since this spell marches someone back to you at gunpoint. Do you really think the relationship can heal after something like that?
It’s really hard to get out of the "if I have this person, or this car, or this money, I’ll be happy." First, we’re programmed to defer our happiness all the time. Second, happiness is a dynamic process, not a static moment.
← PreviousTags: essay
Subscribe Feed (RSS)